2012 UT App 261 - State v. Harrison’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jau-Fei Chen v. Stewart · State v. Low · State v. Robbins · State v. Workman · State v. Montoya
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a trial court's denial of a motion for directed verdict ... on the basis of insufficiency of the evidence ... only if, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, we conclude that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“if, upon reviewing the evidence and all inferences that can be reasonably drawn from it, we conclude that some evidence exists from which a reasonable jury could find that the elements of the crime had been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“When challenging the sufficiency of evidence, the challenging party has a duty to 'marshal all record evidence that supports' a court's ruling that there is sufficient evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.