2012 UT App 267 - State v. Marchet’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2014
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Crawford v. Washington · Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc · Shepard v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Iwle are hardly convinced that P.C.'s fortune of not having been raped or sodomized necessarily renders her testimony so different from the other witnesses as to remove her experience from the realm of admissible evidence under rule 404(b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Marchet“contain the contentions and reasons of the appellant with respect to the issues presented,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Marchet“'a lesser sexual advance ... not amounting to aggravated sexual assault, rape or sodomy'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.