Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2012 UTAPP 275 - Anderson & Karrenberg v. Warnick

Anderson & Karrenberg v. Warnick’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

1 district · 15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Valcarce v. Fitzgerald · R.T. Nielson Co. v. Cook · Prince v. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co. · Bilanzich v. Lonetti · Hooban v. Unicity International, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As a general rule, attorney fees are recoverable only if authorized by contract or statute.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A court may award ... attorney fees to either party that prevails in a civil action based upon any ... written contract . when the provisions of the ... written contract ... allow at least one party to recover attorney fees.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'[wlhether attorney fees are recoverable in an action is a question of law, which we review for correctness'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.