Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2012 UT App 290 - State v. Johnson

2012 UT App 290 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on J.M.W. v. T.I.Z. · United Park City Mines Co. v. Stichting Mayflower Mountain Fonds · 2009 UT App 382 - State v. Johnson · Summer v. Summer · 2012 UT App 3 - State v. Merrill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to designate critical portions of the record as part of the record on appeal,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.