Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2012 UT App 34 - State v. Brooks

2012 UT App 34 - State v. Brooks’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Holgate · State v. Weaver · State v. Chacon · State v. Wanosik · State v. Maestas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Rleview under the plain error doctrine is not available when counsel invites the error by affirmatively representing to the district court that there is no objection to the proceedings.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “An appellate court reviews the district court's decision to grant, modify or revoke probation for abuse of discretion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In order to demonstrate plain error, [Wife] must establish that (1) the district court erred, (2) the error should have been obvious to the district court, and (8) the error was harmful.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.