2012 UT App 363 - State v. Peterson’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Navajo Nation v. State · Richards v. Baum · Guardian Ad Litem v. State Ex Rel. Cd · State v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“cireumstances change so that the controversy is eliminated, thereby rendering the relief requested impossible or of no legal effect.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[where the issues that were before the trial court no longer exist, the appellate court will not review the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McClellan“'only if it is shown that there is no possibility that any collateral legal consequences will be imposed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McClellan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.