2012 UT App 367 - State v. Mills’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

11 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “if upon reviewing the evidence and all inferences that can be reasonably drawn from it, [we conclude] that some evidence exists from which a reasonable jury could find that the elements of the crime had been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Gibson · 2014 UT App 198 - State v. Williams

2. “After review of the evidence, including viewing the video footage that was admitted into evidence at trial, we disagree. ¶49 When considering whether to overturn a jury's verdict on the ground that the evidence presented was insufficient to support a conviction, we consider the evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the jury's verdict and uphold the verdict if”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 2018 UT App 21 - State v. Carrell

3. “[t]he overall length, form, and circumstances of the voluntary, transcontinental telephone interview simply do not rise to the level of being so long, so draining, or so fierce as to be problematic under Miranda”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Brian L. Halverson