2012 UT App 372 - State v. Rincon’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 408 (§ 208 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on State v. Green · State ex rel. Z.C. · Associated General Contractors v. Board of Oil, Gas & Mining · Platts v. Parents Helping Parents · Berrett v. Purser & Edwards
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[O]ur jurisprudence prohibits us from reading substantive terms into a statute that are not already there.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“we seek to avoid an interpretation that leads to absurd results,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.