Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2012 UT App 52 - State v. Samples

2012 UT App 52 - State v. Samples’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Holgate · State v. Workman · State v. Ross · State v. Lyman · State v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We will only conclude that the evidence was insufficient if it 'is sufficiently inconclusive or inherently improbable such that reasonable minds must have entertained a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime for which he or she was convicted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Because this case comes before us on plain error review ... we need only decide whether the alleged insufficiency of the evidence was such that it was an obvious and fundamental error to submit the case to the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “On appeal, we review the record facts in a light most favorable to the jury’s verdict and recite the facts accordingly. We present conflicting evidence only as necessary to, understand issues raised on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.