Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “for allowing withdrawal, he argues, no cireumstance will satisfy the standard and Rule 82(d) as it was intended to apply to pre-sentence motions is functionally dead. [¶ 11] The State asserts the district court's ruling denying the motion was reasonable. Citing Dobbins, the State argues that a district court may deny a motion upon finding that the requirements of W.R.Cr.P. 11 were met when the plea was accepted. Because those requirements were met in this case, the State contends the district court had”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Timothy James Russell v. The State of Wyoming

2. “[A]t the time [the appellant] moved to withdraw his guilty plea, he had not been sentenced within the meaning of Rule 32(d); rather, the district court had deferred a judgment of guilt and conviction and placed him on probation under § 7-13-301. Therefore, the district court had tbe discretion to permit him to withdraw his plea upon a showing of any fair and just reason.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Berger v. State

3. “we must determine whether the trial court could reasonably conclude as it did and whether any facet of its ruling was arbitrary or capricious.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. John Leslie Chapman v. The State of Wyoming