Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2013 MT 79 - State v. Jay

State v. Jay’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

53 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Washington v. Texas · Rock v. Arkansas · Crane v. Kentucky · Holmes v. South Carolina · United States v. Downing

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “formed fixed opinions on the guilt or innocence of the defendant which [he] would not be able to lay aside and render a verdict based solely on evidence presented in court”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'abridged by evidence rules that infringe upon a weighty interest of the accused and are arbitrary or disproportionate to the purposes they are designed to serve.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'[a] lesser-included offense instruction is not supported by the evidence when the defendant's evidence or theory, if believed, would require an acquittal.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.