Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2013 MT 97 - State v. McDonald

State v. McDonald’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

48 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Arlington · State v. Rosling · State v. Stringer · State v. Daniels · State v. Clyde Hayden Sr.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We generally do not review on appeal issues that were not raised before the district court. However, we may undertake review of such an issue under the plain error doctrine in situations that implicate a defendant’s fundamental constitutional rights when failing to review the alleged error may result in a manifest miscarriage of justice, leave unsettled the question of the fundamental fairness of the proceedings, or compromise the integrity of the judicial process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A prosecutor's misconduct may be grounds for reversing a conviction and granting a new trial if the conduct deprives the defendant of a fair and impartial trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “defendant must show that the argument violated his substantial rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.