Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2013 ND 167 - Anderson v. Jenkins

Anderson v. Jenkins’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wolt v. Wolt · Schumacker v. Schumacker · Kartes v. Kartes · O'Neill v. O'Neill · Green v. Green

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A party seeking modification of an order concerning primary residential responsibility shall serve and file moving papers and supporting affidavits and shall- give notice to the other -party to the proceeding who may serve and file a response and opposing affidavits. The court shall consider the motion on briefs and without oral argument or evidentia-ry hearing and shall deny the motion unless the court finds the moving party has established a prima facie case justifying a modification. The court shall set a date for an evidentiary hearing only if a prima facie case is established.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““[T]he court may conclude the moving party failed to establish a prima facie case only if: (1) the opposing party’s counter-affidavits conclusively establish that the moving party’s allegations have no credibility; or (2) the moving party’s allegations are insufficient on their face, even if uncontradicted, to justify modification. Unless the counter-affidavits conclusively establish the movant’s allegations have no credibility, the district court must accept the truth of the moving party’s allegations.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.