Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2013 ND 183 - State v. Whitman

State v. Whitman’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Olano · Davis v. United States · United States v. Atkinson · Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial court’s findings of fact in preliminary proceedings of a criminal case will not be reversed if, after the conflicts in the testimony are resolved in favor of affirmance, there is sufficient competent evidence fairly capable of supporting the trial court’s findings, and the decision is not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. We do not conduct a de novo review. We evaluate the evidence presented to see, based on the standard of review, if it supports the findings of fact.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.