Erickson v. Rubey’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Van Grinsven v. G.R.H. · Cass County State's Attorney v. E.W.F. · Williston Farm Equipment, Inc. v. Steiger Tractor, Inc. · Gorsuch v. Gorsuch · Erickson v. Rubey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The party challenging the exclusion of evidence must offer proof demonstrating prejudice from the restriction. Perius v. Nodak Mut. Ins. Co. , 2012 ND 54 , ¶ 6, 813 N.W.2d 580 . These showings create the required record for appellate review. Gorsuch v. Gorsuch , 392 N.W.2d 392 , 394 (N.D. 1986). This Court is unable to review the issue absent such an offer of proof. Id .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Beltran
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.