Hanisch v. Kroshus’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

11 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““This Court will not reverse a district court’s decision to grant a restraining order or to conduct a hearing absent an abuse of discretion. The district court abuses its discretion when it acts in an arbitrary, unreasonable, or unconscionable manner, when it misinterprets or misapplies the law, or when its decision is not the product of a rational mental process leading to a reasoned determination.””

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Mitzel v. Larson · J.B. v. R.B.

2. ““5. The court may grant a disorderly conduct restraining order ordering the respondent to cease or avoid the disorderly conduct or to have no contact with the applicant if: d. The court finds after the hearing that there are reasonable.grounds to believe that the respondent has engaged in disorderly conduct. If a person claims to have been engaged in a constitutionally protected activity, the court shall determine the validity of the claim as a matter of law and, if found valid, shall exclude evidence of the activity.””

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. J.B. v. R.B. · Keller v. Keller

3. “established through her sworn petition and testimony at the hearing that [respondent] had sent her the harassing text messages and pictures of her genitals and other private parts of her body, at least some taken without her consent, via text message to her. She also established that in at least one message [respondent] threatened to put some pictures on an internet website.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. J.B. v. R.B.