¶1Filed 4/4/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court
¶2IN THE SUPREME COURT
¶3STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
¶11Larry Allen Froistad, Jr., Plaintiff and Appellant
¶13v.
¶15Robyn Schmalenberger, Warden,
¶16North Dakota State
¶17Penitentiary, Eddy Wilson,
¶18Warden, Wyoming State
¶19Penitentiary, Defendants and Appellees
¶23No. 20120381
¶27Appeal from the District Court of Bowman County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Zane Anderson, Judge.
¶29AFFIRMED.
¶31Per Curiam.
¶33Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, 402 1st Street NW, Mandan, ND 58554-3118, for plaintiff and appellant.
¶35James D. Gion, State’s Attorney, 23 Main Avenue, P.O. Box 101, Regent, ND 58650-0101, for defendants and appellees.
¶37No. 20120381
¶39Per Curiam.
¶40[¶1] Larry Froistad appeals a district court order summarily denying his petition for
¶41post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Froistad argues the State withheld exculpatory evidence and newly discovered evidence warrants a new trial. Froistad sought and was denied post-conviction relief after a full hearing. Denial of Froistad’s requested relief was affirmed. Froistad v. State, 2002 ND 52, 641 N.W.2d 86. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). Steen v. State, 2007 ND 123, ¶ 13, 736 N.W.2d 457 (“[M]isuse of process occurs when a post-conviction relief applicant ‘presents a claim for relief which the applicant inexcusably failed to raise either in a proceeding leading to judgment of conviction and sentence or in a previous postconviction proceeding.’”) (quotation omitted).
¶42[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
¶43Daniel J. Crothers
¶44Mary Muehlen Maring
¶45Carol Ronning Kapsner
¶46Dale V. Sandstrom