State v. S. Erwin & R. Erwin’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2013
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Whren v. United States · Martinmaas v. Engelmann · State v. Akuba · State v. Jucht · State v. Herren
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A motion to suppress based on an alleged violation of a constitutionally protected right is a question of law reviewed de novo. The trial court's factual findings are reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard. Once the facts have been determined, however, the application of a legal standard to those facts is a question of law reviewed de novo. This Court will not be restricted by the trial court's legal rationale.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.