Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2013 UT 68 - State v. Perea

State v. Perea’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
4
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

50 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Rhode Island v. Innis · Solem v. Helm · Williams v. People of State of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “19 Aleh next contends that the trial court erred by limiting his cross-examination of the escort's testimony under rules 412 and 608 of the Utah Rules of Evidence. "Even if the [trial] court did err, we will not reverse if that error was harmless.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is a doctrine used when a single error may not constitute grounds for reversal, but many errors, when taken collectively, nonetheless undermine confidence in the fairness of a trial”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[Aln issue is inadequately briefed when it merely contains bald citation[s] to authority [without] development of that authority and reasoned analysis based on that authority.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.