Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2013 UT App 102 - State v. Brady

2013 UT App 102 - State v. Brady’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bearden v. Georgia · State v. Archuleta · State v. Maestas · 2012 UT App 34 - State v. Brooks · State v. Orr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “admitted to violating his probation by failing to pay anything toward the restitution, but described his efforts to find a job and his overwhelming. financial obligations in an effort to mitigate the impact of his violation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “failled] to see how this amounted to a violation of Brady's due process rights, especially where he admitted to violating his probation and the trial court considered his mitigating testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[Fjor a trial court to revoke probation based on a probation violation, the court must determine by a preponderance of the evidence that the violation was willful.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.