Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2013 UT App 104 - State v. Beckstrom

2013 UT App 104 - State v. Beckstrom’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Brinegar v. United States · United States v. Sharpe · State v. Sery · State v. Brake

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Of course, when some but not all of these factors are present, an officer may at least have a reasonable, articulable suspicion that a suspect has been driving under the influence, and that suspicion will warrant prolonging a suspect's detention for further investigation so that the officer's suspicion can be dispelled or confirmed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.