Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2013 UT App 136 - Ross v. Epic Engineering, PC

2013 UT App 136 - Ross v. Epic Engineering, PC’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Orvis v. Johnson · IHC Health Services, Inc. v. D & K MANAGEMENT, INC. · Wycalis v. Guardian Title of Utah · Eskelson v. Davis Hosp. & Medical Center · State v. Holm

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “ln order to justify reversall,] the appellant must show error that was substantial and prejudicial in the sense there is at least a reasonable likelihood that in the absence of the error the result would have been different.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'The court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which - does not affect the substantial rights of the parties?”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “An appellate court reviews a trial court's legal conclusions and ultimate grant or denial of summary judgment for correctness and views the facts and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.