Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2013 UTAPP 142 - State v. Wright

State v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

38 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Dunn · State v. Tosh · State v. Menzies · Allen v. Friel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'only if the cumulative ef-feet of the several errors undermines our confidence ... that a fair trial was had.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “appeal[ed] to the jurors' emotions by contending that the jury hafd] a duty to protect the alleged vietim-to become her partisan-which divert[ed] their attention from their legal duty to impartially apply the law to the facts.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In the absence of any circumstances suggesting otherwise, courts presume that the jury follows ... instructions.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.