2013 UT App 15 - State v. Stringham’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Holgate · State v. Whittle · State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We accordingly affirm, as we cannot conclude in light of this evidence that 'reasonable minds must have entertained a reasonable doubt' about the essential elements”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“trial counsel did not render deficient performance by failing to make a motion for a directed verdict ... [based upon] the sufficiency of the evidence,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Given the evidence and the inferences reasonably drawn therefrom, there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.