Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2013 UTAPP 166 - State v. Ruiz

State v. Ruiz’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 203 Wis. 2d 43 - State v. Behnke · State v. Laycock · State v. McBride · State v. Robinson · State v. Mast

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[In the case of restitution, a reviewing 'court will not disturb a district court's determination unless the 'court exceeds the authority prescribed by law or abuses its discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] defendant may be ordered to pay restitution only for pecuniary loss resulting from a crime he either was convicted of or admitted responsibility for.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the extent to which the therapy at La Europa was necessitated by preexisting conditions that' were neither caused nor exacerbated by Ruiz's actions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.