2013 UT App 232 - Woolums v. Woolums’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2023
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bell v. Bell · Griffith v. Griffith · Howell v. Howell · 2008 UT App 392 - Jensen v. Jensen · Baker v. Baker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he district court's evaluation of and reliance on Wife's testimony, along with its own determinations of the reasonableness of the claimed expenses, fell squarely within its broad discretion to determine an appropriate alimony award”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“may be necessarily lower than needed to maintain an appropriate standard of living for various reasons, including, possibly, lack of income.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“maintain the standard of living established over the course of the marriage rather than the amount that is actually being spent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.