2013 UT App 92 - State v. Ginter’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Lactod, 76l P.2d at 30 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Thus, an Allen instruction need not precisely conform to the ABA model or to the language approved in prior cases. 151 Defendant criticizes the language of Instruction 37 in three ways, claiming that it is coercive per se. First, Defendant claims that Instruction 837”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Dalton

2. “In that case, the United States Supreme Court approved the use of supplemental jury instructions to help a deadlocked jury reach a unanimous verdict. This type of jury instruction is also referred to as a 'dynamite' instruction, 'verdict-urging' instruction, or 'hammer' instruction.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Jessop v. Hardman

3. “creatfel the possibility that the holdout juror might have the mistaken impression that she was being directly and individually instructed by the trial judge to defer to the conclusions of the majority.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Dalton