Davis v. Deen’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
September 2021
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Specifically, the State contends that the language requires the prosecuting attorney to first know that the information in the documents retained by the crime lab would negate a defendant's guilt or reduce his punishment before the documents are required to be disclosed. Here, because the information Linell sought had no bearing on Linell's guilt or sentence, the State argues that the prosecuting attorney was not statutorily required to disclose the crime lab documents to Linell. Arkansas Code Annotated section 12-12-312(a)(1)(B)(i) states that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Linell v. State“[t]his section does not diminish the right of a defendant or his or her attorney to full access to all records pertaining to the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Linell v. State“is discretionary as it relates to releasing information to the public ,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Linell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.