Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2014 Ark. App. 81 - King v. State

2014 Ark. App. 81 - King v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
December 2019
most recently cited

27 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Flanagan v. State · 2012 Ark. App. 7 - St. Joseph's Mercy Medical Center v. Redmond · 2013 Ark. App. 658 - Davis v. State · 2010 Ark. App. 792 - Franklin v. State · 2011 Ark. App. 4 - Charland v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) The person possesses the means to weigh, separate or package methamphetamine or cocaine; or (2) The person possesses a record indicating a drug-related transaction; or (3) The methamphetamine or cocaine is separated and packaged in a manner to facilitate delivery; or (4) The person possesses a firearm that is in the immediate physical control of the person at the time of the possession of methamphetamine or cocaine; or (5) The person possesses at least two (2) other controlled substances in any amount; or (6) Other relevant and admissible evidence that contributes to the proof that a person's purpose was to deliver methamphetamine or cocaine.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.