Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2014 ME 87 - In re E.L.

In re E.L.’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Kafia M. · In re B.C. · In Re Rachel J. · In re Tabitha R.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if any evidence in the record can rationally be understood to establish as more likely than not that the [children were] in circumstances of jeopardy to [their] health and welfare.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.