Houden v. Todd’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited
24 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1447
Relies on Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp. · Diamond v. Charles · Alioto Et Al. v. Williams Et Al. · Williams v. Alioto · Doe v. Marshall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the amount and character of the services rendered; (2) the labor, time and trouble involved; (3) the character and importance of the litigation in which the services were rendered; (4) the amount of money or the value of the property to be affected; (5) the professional skill and experience called for; (6) the attorneys' character and standing in their profession; and (7) the results secured by the services of the attorneys.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“it acts arbitrarily without employment of conscientious judgment or exceeds the bounds of reason resulting in substantial injustice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.