Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2014 MT 131 - State v. Fenner

State v. Fenner’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 76 Cal. App. 4th 1266 - People v. Hove · State v. Hilgers · State v. Johnson · State v. Kuykendall · State v. Gordon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “fact that [the injured party] had insured himself for medical expenses was due to good fortune and foresight; it should not benefit his attacker rather than himself or his insurance company.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “there is no [statutory] provision requiring deduction of any such [insurance] reimbursement ** from the amount the offender must be ordered to pay.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is not entitled to benefit from an offset based on the insurance pay-out of his victim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.