Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2014 MT 139 - State v. Crider

State v. Crider’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
2
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

47 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Whitlow v. State · State v. Just · Hulse v. State, Department of Justice · State v. Matt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a party may not wish to register an objection in the presence of the jury for tactical reasons, yet may wish to preserve the objection on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The motion in limine must specify the evidence to which the defendant is objecting.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “sufficiently specific as to the basis for the objection.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.