Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2014 MT 140 - State v. James Cudd

State v. James Cudd’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Good · State v. Allen · State v. Jay · State v. Golie · State v. Falls Down

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A district court abuses its discretion if it denies a challenge for cause when a prospective juror's statements ** during voir dire raise serious doubts about the juror's ability to be fair and impartial or actual bias is discovered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Jurors who state that they are unable or unwilling to suspend their prejudicial beliefs and follow the law should be excused for cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “coaxed recantations elicited by counsel because spontaneous statements are most likely to be reliable and honest,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.