Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2014 MT 206 - State v. Chilinski

State v. Chilinski’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Wilson v. Layne · Libretti v. United States · State v. Finley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Generic categories or general descriptions of items are not necessarily invalid if a more precise description of the items to be seized is not possible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “depending on the circumstances of the case and the type of items involved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.