Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2014 ND 101 - State v. Kalmio

State v. Kalmio’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Davis v. Washington · United States v. Joe · United States v. Tokars · Womack v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]lthough Kalmio argued in the district court that the evidence was inadmissible hearsay and prior bad act evidence, he limit[ed] his argument on appeal to hearsay grounds.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “whether the district court abused its discretion in allowing hearsay testimony and in performing its relevancy analysis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.