State v. Rahier’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
March 2026
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Askew · State v. Graf · 18 Or. App. 647 - State v. Mickelson · 163 Ind. App. 35 - Salter v. State · State v. Torkelsen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[T]his Court defers to the district court’s findings of fact and resolves conflicts in testimony in favor of affirmance. This Court will affirm a district court decision regarding a motion to suppress if there is sufficient competent evidence fairly capable of supporting the district court’s findings, and the decision is not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. Questions of law. are fully reviewable on appeal, and whether a finding of fact meets a legal standard is a question of law.” ’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Knox“in the hopes it is later validated by tallying the knowledge of every officer and agency involved in the case”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hurlburt v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.