Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2014 ND 153 - State v. Rahier

State v. Rahier’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Askew · State v. Graf · 18 Or. App. 647 - State v. Mickelson · 163 Ind. App. 35 - Salter v. State · State v. Torkelsen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[T]his Court defers to the district court’s findings of fact and resolves conflicts in testimony in favor of affirmance. This Court will affirm a district court decision regarding a motion to suppress if there is sufficient competent evidence fairly capable of supporting the district court’s findings, and the decision is not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. Questions of law. are fully reviewable on appeal, and whether a finding of fact meets a legal standard is a question of law.” ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “in the hopes it is later validated by tallying the knowledge of every officer and agency involved in the case”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.