Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2014 ND 31 - Wamstad v. Mangelsen

Wamstad v. Mangelsen’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 2025
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kansas v. Crane · In re the Name Change of the State Bar Board · Burdick v. Wolff · Feland v. J.M. · Estate of Christeson v. Gilstad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This Court's function is to interpret the statute as written by the legislature, and '[t]he justice, wisdom, necessity, utility and expediency of legislation are questions for legislative, and not for judicial determination.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.