Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2014 ND 41 - Osier v. State

Osier v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Osier · State v. Osier · Bahtiraj v. State · Broadwell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““must establish both prongs of the Strickland test and demonstrate (1) counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) he was prejudiced by counsel’s deficient performance. Whether a defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel is a mixed question of law and fact which is fully reviewable on appeal.””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.