2014 Pa. Super. 199 - Commonwealth v. Bowmaster’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jones v. United States · Florida v. Jardines · 415 Pa. Super. 252 - Commonwealth v. Lopez · Commonwealth v. Williams · Commonwealth v. Roland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Absent probable cause and exigent circumstances, warrantless searches and seizures in a private home violate both the Fourth Amendment [of the United States Constitution] and Article 1[,] § 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Commonwealth v. Duke“where the occupants have a reasonable expectation of privacy that society is prepared to accept.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“danger to police or other persons inside or outside the dwelling.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Commonwealth v. Duke
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.