2014 Pa. Super. 22 - Commonwealth v. Spuck’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2023
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Cupps · Commonwealth v. Roney · Commonwealth v. Zhahir · 2007 Pa. Super. 222 - Bombar v. West American Insurance Co. · 306 Pa. Super. 1 - Commonwealth v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he attorney or the unrepresented filing party shall include a certification that the brief complies with the word count limits.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Briefs ... shall conform in all material respects with the requirements of these rules as nearly as the circumstances of the particular case will admit, otherwise they may be suppressed, and, if the defects are in the brief ... of the appellant and are substantial, the appeal or other matter may be quashed or dismissed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“The certification requirement is not limited to counsel: Pro se litigants, too, are obliged to provide a certification for a primary brief that exceeds thirty pages.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. In re Delevie
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.