2014 Pa. Super. 45 - Commonwealth v. Colon’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Commonwealth v. Whitaker · Jones v. Commonwealth · 2006 Pa. Super. 170 - Commonwealth v. Preston · Commonwealth v. DeBlase
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[T]he Commonwealth must do everything reasonable within its power to guarantee that a trial begins on time," and the Commonwealth has the burden of demonstrating by a preponderance of the evidence that it exercised due diligence. "As has been oft stated, [d]ue diligence is fact-specific, to be determined case-by-case; it does not require perfect vigilance and punctilious care, but merely a showing the Commonwealth has put forth a reasonable effort."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“failure of the Commonwealth to commence trial within 365 days from the filing of the complaint constitutes a technical Rule 600 violation[, and] the Commonwealth has the burden of demonstrating by a preponderance of the evidence that it exercised due diligence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“delays attributable to Appellant occurred well after 365 days had already passed since the filing of the complaint, and have no bearing on the Commonwealth's failure to commence trial before the expiration of the mechanical run date”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.