State v. Burkett’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1202
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Johnson v. Zerbst · United States v. Arvizu · McCleskey v. Zant · Burgett v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The 911 caller in this case reported more than a minor traffic infraction and more than a conclusory allegation of drunk or reckless driving. Instead, she alleged a specific and dangerous result of the driver’s conduct: running another car off the highway. That conduct bears too great a resemblance to paradigmatic manifestations of drunk driving to be dismissed as an isolated example of recklessness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Walter“Reasonable suspicion to stop must be based on specific and articulable facts which taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant the intrusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Bowers“The Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures applies when a car is stopped by law enforcement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Bowers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.