Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2014 UT 1 - State v. Bedell

State v. Bedell’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

32 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Dunn · State v. Litherland · State v. Clark · State v. Kelley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not required to constantly survey or second-guess a nonobjecting party's best interests or trial strategy and is not expected to intervene in the proceedings unless the evidence would serve no conceivable strategic purpose.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “absent the error, there is a reasonable likelihood of a more favorable outcome for the appellant, or phrased differently, our confidence in the verdict is undermined.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[pllain error does not exist when 'a concelvable strategic purpose' exists to support the use of the evidence.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.