Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2014 UT 19 - Honie v. State

Honie v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
2
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

69 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Knowles v. Mirzayance · Cullen v. Pinholster · Cullen v. Pinholster

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because failure to establish either prong of the test is fatal to an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, we are free to address [a defendant's] claims under either prong.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “To succeed on his ineffective-assistance claim, Defendant is required to prove 'that counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness' and 'that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofes-gional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “bears the burden of proving that counsel's errors actually had an adverse ef-. feet on the defense and that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's ... errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.