Allred v. Saunders’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “it is sometimes appropriate to consider legislative history when interpreting statutes”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. C.E.L. v. T.L. (In Re Adoption of B.N.A.) · Belnap v. Howard

2. “in camera review is not required in all cases. Rather, parties seeking to withhold arguably privileged material from discovery must create a privilege log identifying each document or item withheld from production and provide sufficient foundational information to allow the court and opposing parties to evaluate the validity of the claimed privilege.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 2018 UT App 15 - Vered v. Tooele Hospital Corporation

3. “If a party withholds discoverable information by claiming that it is privileged ... the party shall make the claim expressly and shall describe the nature of the documents, communications, or things not produced in a manner that, without revealing the information itself, will enable other parties to evaluate the claim.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 2018 UT App 15 - Vered v. Tooele Hospital Corporation