Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2014 UT 44 - State v. Sessions

State v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Batson v. Kentucky · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Arizona v. Fulminante · Neder v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order to prevail on [a] claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, [a defendant] must show that his counsel's actions prejudiced him because those actions allowed the seating of an actually biased juror.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is a matter of federal law, on which we are bound to follow Supreme Court precedent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “fell below an objective standard of reasonable professional judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.