Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2014 UTAPP 192 - State v. Doutre

State v. Doutre’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Malloy v. Hogan · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Harrington v. Richter · McNeill v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When in the opinion of the court it is proper for the jury to view the place in which the offense is alleged to have been committed ... it may order them to be conducted in a body under the charge of an officer to the place, which shall be shown to them by some person appointed by the court for that purpose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]rial counsel was ... deficient for failing to object to the State's failure to give reasonable prior notice of [a witness's] expert testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[W]e cannot conceive of a sound [tactical] basis for failing to object [to expert witness testimony] on rule 702 grounds in this case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.