2014 UT App 196 - Prows v. Labor Commission’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on LPI Services and/or Travelers Indemnity Co. v. McGee · King v. Industrial Com'n of Utah · Berneau v. Martino · Utah Chapter of the Sierra Club v. Air Quality Board · State v. Wallace
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(i) the employee is not gainfully employed; (i) the emplbyee has an impairment or combination of impairments that limit the employee's ability to do basic work activities; (i) the industrial or occupatlonally caused impairment or combination of impairments prevent the employee from performing the essential functions of the work activities for which the employee has been qualified until the time of the industrial accident ... that is the basis for the employee's permanent total disability claim; and (iv) the employee cannot perform other work reasonably available, taking into consideration the employee's [age, ed ucation, past work experience, medical capacity, and residual functional capacity.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Typically, we understand 'is' as a present-tense form of the verb 'to be.' Accordingly, we assume that the legislature used 'is' here as a present-tense verb.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Scott v. Scott“[When the plain meaning of the statute can be discerned from its language, no other interpretive tools are needed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.