Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2014 UTAPP 203 - Bodell Construction Co. v. Robbins

Bodell Construction Co. v. Robbins’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Menzies v. Galetka · Bodell Construction Co. v. Robbins · Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc. v. Melvin · Fisher v. Bybee · Jones v. Layton/Okland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[D]il-igence on the part of the party claiming excusable neglect is an essential element of that inquiry, and relief may not be granted based on other equitable considerations where a party has exercised no diligence at all.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In addition, we note that our review of a district court's rule 60(b) order is limited in scope because such an appeal must only address the propriety of the denial or grant of relief, not the correctness of the underlying judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[wle review a district court's findings of fact under a clear error standard of review, while [wle review a district court's conclusions of law for correctness, affording the trial court no deference.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.